Back to Blog

Flutter vs Swift for iOS Development 2026: Complete Comparison

Comprehensive comparison of Flutter and Swift for iOS app development. Learn performance, development speed, costs, and when to choose each technology.

Hevcode Team
January 28, 2026

Building an iOS app? The choice between Flutter (cross-platform) and Swift (native) significantly impacts your project. This guide provides a detailed comparison to help you decide.

Quick Comparison

Factor Flutter Swift
Platforms iOS, Android, Web, Desktop iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS
Performance Near-native Best possible
UI Fidelity Excellent Perfect
Development Speed Faster Moderate
iOS Features Good (with plugins) Complete
Learning Curve Moderate (Dart) Moderate (Swift)
Community Growing Mature

Overview

Flutter

By: Google Language: Dart UI Approach: Own rendering engine (Skia/Impeller) Best for: Cross-platform apps, startups, MVPs

Flutter renders its own UI using the Skia graphics engine (now Impeller on iOS), giving consistent look across platforms but not using native UI components.

Swift

By: Apple Language: Swift UI Approach: Native UIKit/SwiftUI Best for: iOS-only apps, Apple ecosystem, performance-critical apps

Swift builds truly native iOS apps using Apple's UI frameworks, providing the best possible iOS experience.

Performance Comparison

Benchmarks

Animation Performance (60fps):
├── Swift (SwiftUI): 60 fps consistently
├── Swift (UIKit): 60 fps consistently
├── Flutter (Impeller): 58-60 fps
└── Flutter (Skia): 55-58 fps

App Startup Time (Simple App):
├── Swift: 400-600ms
└── Flutter: 600-900ms

Memory Usage:
├── Swift: 50-80 MB typical
└── Flutter: 80-120 MB typical

App Size (Empty App):
├── Swift: ~10 MB
└── Flutter: ~20-25 MB

When Performance Matters

Choose Swift for:

  • Games with complex graphics
  • Camera/video processing apps
  • AR/VR applications
  • Apps with heavy animations
  • Apps requiring minimal footprint

Choose Flutter for:

  • Business applications
  • E-commerce apps
  • Social apps
  • Content apps
  • MVPs where cross-platform matters more

Development Speed

Flutter: Faster Cross-Platform

// Single codebase for iOS + Android
// Hot reload for instant changes
// Widget-based UI

class MyApp extends StatelessWidget {
  @override
  Widget build(BuildContext context) {
    return MaterialApp(
      home: Scaffold(
        appBar: AppBar(title: Text('My App')),
        body: Center(
          child: ElevatedButton(
            onPressed: () {},
            child: Text('Click Me'),
          ),
        ),
      ),
    );
  }
}

Time to build same app:

iOS + Android with Flutter: 3 months
iOS only with Swift: 2.5 months
iOS + Android with Swift + Kotlin: 5 months

Swift: Faster for iOS-Only

// Native iOS development
// SwiftUI previews for quick iteration
// Direct access to all iOS APIs

struct ContentView: View {
    var body: some View {
        NavigationView {
            VStack {
                Button("Click Me") {
                    // action
                }
                .buttonStyle(.borderedProminent)
            }
            .navigationTitle("My App")
        }
    }
}

Development speed factors:

Factor Flutter Swift
Hot Reload Yes (instant) Yes (SwiftUI previews)
Code Reuse iOS + Android iOS only
Third-party Libraries Growing ecosystem Mature ecosystem
Platform Features Via plugins Direct access

UI/UX Comparison

Flutter UI

Flutter uses its own rendering engine, not native iOS components.

Pros:

  • Consistent across platforms
  • Highly customizable
  • Beautiful animations built-in
  • Material and Cupertino widgets

Cons:

  • Not truly native feel
  • May not match iOS design updates immediately
  • Custom widgets for iOS-specific patterns
// Flutter iOS-style widget
CupertinoApp(
  home: CupertinoPageScaffold(
    navigationBar: CupertinoNavigationBar(
      middle: Text('iOS Style'),
    ),
    child: Center(
      child: CupertinoButton.filled(
        onPressed: () {},
        child: Text('Cupertino Button'),
      ),
    ),
  ),
)

Swift UI

Swift uses native iOS components (UIKit or SwiftUI).

Pros:

  • Perfect iOS look and feel
  • Automatic iOS updates
  • Native haptics, gestures
  • SF Symbols built-in

Cons:

  • iOS-specific only
  • SwiftUI still evolving
  • Different patterns for Android
// SwiftUI native component
struct ContentView: View {
    var body: some View {
        NavigationStack {
            List {
                ForEach(items) { item in
                    NavigationLink(value: item) {
                        Label(item.name, systemImage: "star")
                    }
                }
            }
            .navigationTitle("My Items")
            .toolbar {
                EditButton()
            }
        }
    }
}

iOS Platform Features

Feature Access Comparison

Feature Flutter Swift
HealthKit Via plugin Native
ARKit Limited plugin Full access
Core ML Via plugin Native
Siri/Shortcuts Limited Full
Widgets Possible (complex) Native
App Clips Not supported Full
Live Activities Limited Native
Dynamic Island Limited Native
CarPlay Limited Full
watchOS Not supported Native

Example: HealthKit Integration

Swift (Native):

import HealthKit

let healthStore = HKHealthStore()

// Request authorization
let typesToRead: Set = [
    HKObjectType.quantityType(forIdentifier: .stepCount)!,
    HKObjectType.quantityType(forIdentifier: .heartRate)!
]

healthStore.requestAuthorization(toShare: nil, read: typesToRead) { success, error in
    // Start reading health data
}

Flutter (Via Plugin):

import 'package:health/health.dart';

final health = Health();

// Request authorization
final types = [HealthDataType.STEPS, HealthDataType.HEART_RATE];
final permissions = [HealthDataAccess.READ, HealthDataAccess.READ];

bool authorized = await health.requestAuthorization(types, permissions: permissions);

Cost Comparison

Development Costs

Flutter iOS App:

Developer rate: $80-120/hour
Simple app: 300 hours = $24,000-36,000
Medium app: 600 hours = $48,000-72,000
Complex app: 1200 hours = $96,000-144,000

Bonus: Android version included!

Swift iOS App:

Developer rate: $100-150/hour
Simple app: 250 hours = $25,000-37,500
Medium app: 500 hours = $50,000-75,000
Complex app: 1000 hours = $100,000-150,000

Note: iOS only

Total Cost Comparison

Scenario Flutter Swift (iOS) Swift + Kotlin
iOS Only $30K-70K $30K-75K N/A
iOS + Android $35K-80K N/A $60K-150K

Long-term Maintenance

Flutter:

  • Single codebase to maintain
  • Framework updates may need migration
  • Plugin dependencies to manage

Swift:

  • Apple ensures compatibility
  • Xcode handles migration
  • Fewer dependencies typically

Team and Hiring

Flutter Developers

Skills needed:

  • Dart programming
  • Widget architecture
  • State management (Provider, Riverpod, BLoC)
  • Platform channels (for native code)

Availability: Growing, especially among web developers

Average salary (US): $100,000-140,000

Swift Developers

Skills needed:

  • Swift language
  • UIKit or SwiftUI
  • Combine framework
  • Apple ecosystem knowledge

Availability: Established market

Average salary (US): $110,000-160,000

Code Examples Comparison

List View

Flutter:

ListView.builder(
  itemCount: items.length,
  itemBuilder: (context, index) {
    final item = items[index];
    return ListTile(
      leading: CircleAvatar(
        backgroundImage: NetworkImage(item.imageUrl),
      ),
      title: Text(item.title),
      subtitle: Text(item.subtitle),
      trailing: Icon(Icons.chevron_right),
      onTap: () => navigateToDetail(item),
    );
  },
)

SwiftUI:

List(items) { item in
    NavigationLink(destination: DetailView(item: item)) {
        HStack {
            AsyncImage(url: item.imageURL) { image in
                image.resizable()
            } placeholder: {
                ProgressView()
            }
            .frame(width: 50, height: 50)
            .clipShape(Circle())

            VStack(alignment: .leading) {
                Text(item.title)
                Text(item.subtitle)
                    .font(.caption)
                    .foregroundColor(.secondary)
            }
        }
    }
}

Network Request

Flutter:

Future<List<User>> fetchUsers() async {
  final response = await http.get(Uri.parse('https://api.example.com/users'));

  if (response.statusCode == 200) {
    final List<dynamic> json = jsonDecode(response.body);
    return json.map((e) => User.fromJson(e)).toList();
  } else {
    throw Exception('Failed to load users');
  }
}

Swift:

func fetchUsers() async throws -> [User] {
    let url = URL(string: "https://api.example.com/users")!
    let (data, response) = try await URLSession.shared.data(from: url)

    guard let httpResponse = response as? HTTPURLResponse,
          httpResponse.statusCode == 200 else {
        throw URLError(.badServerResponse)
    }

    return try JSONDecoder().decode([User].self, from: data)
}

Decision Framework

Choose Flutter If:

□ Building for iOS AND Android
□ Limited budget
□ Need to launch quickly
□ Team knows Dart/JavaScript
□ UI consistency across platforms important
□ Don't need deep iOS integrations
□ Building business/content app

Choose Swift If:

□ Building iOS-only app
□ Need best possible performance
□ Using Apple-specific features (ARKit, HealthKit, etc.)
□ Building for Apple Watch/TV
□ Need perfect iOS look and feel
□ Team knows Swift
□ Long-term iOS investment

Real-World Decisions

Companies Using Flutter for iOS

  • Google Pay
  • BMW
  • Alibaba
  • eBay Motors
  • Philips Hue

Companies Using Swift

  • Apple (all apps)
  • LinkedIn
  • Lyft
  • Airbnb
  • Kickstarter

Hybrid Approaches

Some companies use both:

  • Core in Flutter, native for features: Main app in Flutter, ARKit features in Swift
  • Different apps for different markets: Flutter for broader reach, Swift for premium iOS version

Conclusion

Choose Flutter when:

  • You need both iOS and Android
  • Budget and time are constraints
  • Cross-platform consistency matters
  • You're building a content/business app

Choose Swift when:

  • iOS is your only/primary platform
  • Performance is critical
  • You need deep iOS integration
  • You're building for the Apple ecosystem

Both are excellent choices for iOS development. The right choice depends on your specific needs, budget, and long-term strategy.

Need help deciding? Contact Hevcode for a free consultation. We'll analyze your requirements and recommend the best approach for your iOS app.

Related Articles

Tags:FlutterSwiftiOS DevelopmentCross-PlatformMobile Development

Need help with your project?

We've helped 534+ clients build successful apps. Let's discuss yours.

Ready to Build Your App?

534+ projects delivered • 4.9★ rating • 6+ years experience

Let's discuss your project — no obligations, just a straightforward conversation.